By
Vlad Shvets
8 Best AI Visibility Tools for Real Estate (2026)
Eight AI visibility tools read for brokerages, portals, and proptech: markets, brands, cited sources, competitors, and the plan that covers both engines.
Eight AI visibility tools read for brokerages, portals, and proptech: markets, brands, cited sources, competitors, and the plan that covers both engines.
Eight AI visibility tools read for brokerages, portals, and proptech: markets, brands, cited sources, competitors, and the plan that covers both engines.
A homeowner in Phoenix asks ChatGPT who buys houses for cash nearby, gets four company names, and calls two before lunch. A brokerage, a listings portal, and a cash-offer startup all want to know if they were in that answer, and in Tucson's, and in Dallas's. In our Zillow citation study, brand-owned sites were cited in 76.40% of recommendation answers on ChatGPT and Google AI Mode.
Knowing which answers, city by city, is where the tools differ. We read the pages of every tool on our competitor leaderboard that tracks both engines and has a public pricing page, and kept eight. None of them documents tracking by metro, so each entry says what its pages prove and what to make the vendor prove in the demo.
Five Things a Real Estate Team Needs a Tool to Show
Real estate is bought, rented, and financed one city at a time, and that turns one visibility question into five:
Metro prompts. Questions tracked and reported by metro, so a strong national number can't hide the cities where you're absent. No tool on this list documents it. Any tool that runs your own prompts can run one with a city in it; none documents reporting by metro.
Per-country tracking. The same questions in more than one country. It matters to portals and proptech brands operating across borders. A country is not a metro, and it is not an office.
Several brands in one account. For franchise groups, portal families, and agencies with several real estate clients. Brands are not offices either.
Citation sources. Which portals, lender pages, government pages, and listings the answer cited. Only three tools here quote URL-level detail.
Competitor share of voice. Which agents, portals, lenders, or cash buyers the engine named beside you, and how often.
Every tool below cleared two bars first: its own pages say it tracks both ChatGPT and Google AI Mode, and its pricing is public or stated as a quote. Past that, each criterion is in one of three states:
Documented: a line on the vendor's own page says it. Shortlist on it, then check it sits on the plan you would buy.
Documented as not offered: the vendor says no. That rules it out on the criterion. No tool here is in this state on any of the five.
Not documented: the pages don't say either way. That is a demo question, never a no.
Qvery is ours, so it sits at the top by our own rule. The other seven are the five highest-ranked tools on our competitor leaderboard that cleared both bars, plus AthenaHQ and Superlines, and they appear in order of how many of the five criteria their pages document. For setting up the measurement itself, measuring a real estate brand's AI visibility covers the method.
1. Qvery: Daily Tracking on Both Engines, Without Metro Reports
Key Features:
Daily tracking of visibility, share of voice, and average rank across ChatGPT and Google AI Mode, in 200+ countries.
Share of voice measured against the other brands named in the same answers.
Every citation captured daily, tied to the query and engine that produced it.
Queries you add and edit, so each metro question can sit in your tracked set.
Qvery Assistant in the app: ask about your own visibility, share of voice, citation, topic, and query data in plain language, and have it add queries, trigger a data run, or export a report.
Pricing:
Starter: €49/month for 1 brand and 25 tracked queries.
Growth: €99/month for 1 brand and 50 tracked queries.
Business: €199 for unlimited brands and 100 tracked queries (the pricing page shows no billing period on this tier).
Every plan includes ChatGPT and Google AI Mode, daily query runs, unlimited countries, and unlimited seats. The paid plans start with a free 7-day trial, no credit card required.
Reddit Score: 85.0% Positive, across 20 mentions. What redditors say:
“tracking mentions in local publications and external sites is key for AI visibility, like Qvery AI does.” (r/smallbusiness)
Only two of those 20 mentions come from people outside our own marketing work, too few to score on their own, so read the percentage as ours.
Start with what Qvery doesn't document, because this is our product and you should hear it from us first. It doesn't document metro reporting or separating offices and teams inside one account. You can add a question with a city in it, and the reporting is by query.
What it does document: daily visibility, share of voice, and average rank on both engines, in 200+ countries, with every citation tied to the query and engine behind it. Several brands in one account come with the Business plan, which lists unlimited brands.
That fits a small marketing team at a brokerage or a proptech company that wants to ask the Assistant which of its questions it is losing, rather than build a report. A national portal with an enterprise procurement process is better served further down this list. To run your own metro questions on both engines, start a free 7-day trial; no credit card is required.
2. Peec AI: URL-Level Sources, With the Plan Question Open
Key Features:
Tracking across all countries, per its home page.
Multi-brand tracking, separately for each brand from one dashboard.
URL-level sources: “which URLs and domains the engine drew on” for each answer.
Competitor share of voice: “Percentage of your brand mentions in AI responses compared to all tracked brands mentioned.”
Daily tracking frequency and unlimited users on every priced plan.
Pricing:
Starter: $95/mo for 50 prompts, 3 models, and 1 project.
Pro: $245/mo for 150 prompts, 3 models, and 2 projects.
Advanced: $495/mo for 350 prompts, 3 models, 5 projects, and multi country.
Enterprise: custom, billed annually, with a choice from all models.
Reddit Score: 68.6% Positive, across 51 mentions about Peec AI. What redditors say:
“I have only tested Peec and have been very satisfied.” (r/SaaS)
“We use Peec AI and it's the best tool out there IMO.” (r/AskMarketing)
Peec AI documents four of the five criteria, tied with Qvery, AthenaHQ, and Superlines for the most on this list, and it quotes URL-level sources, which is what a brokerage needs to see its own agent and listing pages in an answer. Metro reporting is the one it doesn't document.
Two plan details matter here. Its AI-instructions page says ChatGPT and Google AI Mode are included by default in every plan, while each priced plan reads “Choose 3 models”; the demo settles which it is. And “Multi country” first appears on the Advanced plan, so a portal working in several countries should price Advanced.
3. AthenaHQ: Brands and Markets, Priced in Credits
Key Features:
Operation across brands and markets: “Global Scale Operate across brands, markets, and models.”
Tracking across multiple brands and business units, centralized in one account.
Source intelligence: “Reveal the sources shaping AI answers.”
Competitor share of voice comparison, and an API.
Pricing:
Essential: free, with 300 credits; its engine list doesn't include Google AI Mode.
Starter: $295/month for 3,600 credits (1 credit = 1 AI response), with ChatGPT and AI Mode; API access and extra credits are paid add-ons.
Enterprise: custom credits, with multi-region and multi-language support.
Reddit Score: 57.1% Positive, across 7 mentions about AthenaHQ. What redditors say:
“We discovered both athena and peec scrape API data and are not giving any insights at all” (r/SaaS)
Seven mentions is a thin base, and this one is a single agency's experience, so weigh it as one opinion.
AthenaHQ documents four criteria: markets, several brands, cited sources, and competitor share of voice. Its sources are described as sources, not URLs, so a team that needs the exact listing page should ask to see one in the demo.
The plan detail is regional. The comparison table lists multi-region support as “Single” on Starter and “Multiple” on Enterprise, and Google AI Mode first appears on Starter, not on the free tier. A portal in several countries is pricing Enterprise, which is a quote, and a team running many metros should do the credit arithmetic before the call.
4. Superlines: Brands by the Plan, Three Engine Picks
Key Features:
Market-specific tracking across regions and languages, with unlimited countries on every plan.
Several brands per plan: 1 on Starter, 3 on Pro, 7 on Growth, and unlimited on Enterprise.
Share of mentions versus competitors, with trend data and unlimited competitor tracking.
Every source clearly labeled in the monitored answers.
Daily prompt frequency, data exports from Pro, and API access from Growth.
Pricing:
Starter: €79/month, or €69/month billed annually, for 50 prompts and 1 brand.
Pro: €199/month, or €175/month billed annually, for 150 prompts and 3 brands.
Growth: €379/month, or €333/month billed annually, for 300 prompts and 7 brands.
Enterprise: tailored pricing, with up to 10 answer engines and unlimited brands.
Starter, Pro, and Growth each track any three answer engines you pick.
Reddit Score: Not scored. One mention about Superlines turned up in the threads we read, which is not enough for a percentage.
Superlines documents four criteria, and its plan table prints the brand count on every plan. A franchise group or portal family can price its exact brand count without a call.
The catch is the engine picks. Starter, Pro, and Growth each track three answer engines of your choosing, so two of the three have to be ChatGPT and Google AI Mode. Its sources are labeled rather than shown as URLs, and metro reporting beyond market-level tracking isn't documented.
5. OtterlyAI: Markets and URLs, Plus an Add-On
Key Features:
Market-by-market performance, with multi-country support (50+) on every plan.
Several brands and clients in Workspaces, with 1 workspace on Lite and unlimited workspaces on Standard and Premium.
Every domain and URL cited in AI answers, checked daily, with link-position changes.
Daily tracking frequency, per the pricing page.
Pricing:
Lite: $29/month, or $25/month billed annually, for 15 search prompts.
Standard: $189/month, or $160/month billed annually, for 100 search prompts.
Premium: $489/month, or $422/month billed annually, for 400 search prompts.
Enterprise: custom pricing.
Google AI Mode is an add-on at $9, $59, or $149 a month on Lite, Standard, and Premium, so both engines start at $38, $248, or $638 a month.
Reddit Score: 69.2% Positive, across 13 mentions about OtterlyAI. What redditors say:
“Otterly/SE Ranking combo wins for SaaS dashboards” (r/SaaS)
“tools like Semrush AI Overview and OtterlyAI help monitor AI citations but full SEO integration lags.” (r/digital_marketing)
OtterlyAI documents markets, several brands, and URL-level citations, which covers the listing-page question well. Competitor share of voice and metro reporting aren't documented.
Google AI Mode costs extra. Its plans track ChatGPT but not Google AI Mode, which costs extra, so the number to compare is the total with the add-on. A brokerage can start at $38 a month for both engines, as long as 15 prompts cover its metros (they won't cover many).
6. Profound: Several Brands, Enterprise Only
Key Features:
Agency Mode: create and manage several brand environments in one account.
Citation analysis: “See which websites influence AI answers about your brand”.
Answer Engine Insights, which track how answer engines mention, rank, and describe a brand.
Pricing:
Trial: free, with limited credits and 50 prompts run daily for 7 days on three engines, none of them Google AI Mode, in one region.
Enterprise: custom, with a tailored prompt tracking plan, up to 9 answer engines, SSO/SAML, and SOC 2 compliance.
Reddit Score: Not scored. One mention about Profound turned up in the threads we read.
Profound documents several brands and the websites behind an answer. Per-country tracking, competitor share of voice, and metro reporting aren't documented, and its sources are websites rather than URLs.
The trial won't answer the Google half: it runs three engines, none of them Google AI Mode, in one region. A national portal with a security review can take that into an Enterprise conversation; a single-office brokerage will find it more procurement than it needs.
7. Ahrefs: URLs and Answer Text, Priced as a Bundle
Key Features:
The specific URLs most frequently cited alongside your brand.
Raw responses stored, searchable for brand mentions and linked citations.
AI Mode share of voice against any competitor you choose.
Daily monitoring of mentions and citations.
Pricing:
Brand Radar AI from $199/mo.
Lite: $129/mo with 5 tracked AI prompts.
Standard: $249/mo with 10 tracked AI prompts.
Advanced: $449/mo with 20 tracked AI prompts.
Enterprise: $1,499/mo, annual commitment required.
Reddit Score: 48.3% Positive, across 378 mentions about Ahrefs. What redditors say:
“I use AHREFs and I recommend that to everyone. :)” (r/SEO)
“Must have been almost a decade ago when Ahrefs upped their prices and I left.” (r/SEO)
Ahrefs documents URL-level citations and competitor share of voice, and it is the only tool here that says it stores the raw answer text. When an engine describes your agents or fees wrong, that text is the evidence. Per-country tracking, several brands, and metro reporting aren't documented.
Brand Radar is sold standalone, with an Ahrefs Free account, but the pricing page doesn't say which plan runs daily prompts on both engines, so the demo question is the bundle and its total.
8. Scrunch: A Leaderboard Pick, Google AI Mode on Enterprise
Key Features:
Citations and sources, listed as a row on its pricing page.
Competitor tracking: 5 competitors on Core, custom on Enterprise.
Country coverage by plan: 1 country on Core, unlimited on Enterprise.
Filtering by AI platform, with ChatGPT and Google AI Mode among those its FAQ names.
Pricing:
Core: $250/mo for 125 unique prompts, 1 brand workspace, 1 country, and four LLMs, with ChatGPT among them and Google AI Mode not.
Enterprise: custom prompts and brand workspaces, unlimited countries, and nine LLMs including Google AI Mode; no price is published.
Reddit Score: 50.0% Positive, across 5 mentions about Scrunch. Four of the five are posts comparing several tools, and the only comment was written by an employee of a rival vendor, so there is no user review to quote.
Scrunch is here because it ranks sixth on our competitor leaderboard, among the five highest that cleared both bars. Its pricing rows document cited sources and competitor tracking, and country coverage on Enterprise.
Core and Enterprise differ on the two things real estate needs. Core tracks one country and doesn't list Google AI Mode, so a team that needs both engines, or more than one country, is pricing Enterprise. Several brands come only on Enterprise, as custom brand workspaces, and metro reporting isn't documented on either plan.
Three Question Sets to Run in Every Demo
Nothing in this review ran these in any tool; they are the tests to make each vendor run, with your metro added to every question.
Brokerage: "top real estate agent services" and "services for selling a house", each with your metro added, for every metro and office you serve.
Portal: "best home value estimate apps", "apps to check what homes sold for in my neighborhood", and "top rental search apps", each with your metro.
Proptech: "find me companies that buy houses as-is for cash", "best lenders for home loans", and "best companies to manage rental properties", each with your metro.
In every set, check six things:
Each metro is reported on its own line, not folded into one national number.
The tool shows whether your brand is recommended, not only mentioned or cited.
Each cited source sits beside its answer, down to the URL if you need the listing or agent page.
ChatGPT and Google AI Mode both run on the plan you would buy, and read separately.
The competitors named instead of you are listed.
For brokerages, offices or teams can be separated inside one account. No tool here documents that.
The Limits of This Review
This is a reading of each vendor's own pages in September 2026, with prices re-checked on the live pricing pages on September 22. We ran no product trials and measured no outcomes, so nothing here says how well any tool performs for a brokerage, portal, or proptech brand.
Metro reporting, office separation, and the three question sets are gaps to test, not findings about any tool. A Reddit score says how people talk about a tool, not whether it fits real estate or measures correctly.
Before You Sign
Name the criteria your team needs, shortlist the tools whose own pages document them, and then make every shortlisted vendor run your metro questions on both engines, on the plan you would buy, and show whether your brand is recommended before you sign. If you want the measurement running first, the real estate AI visibility guide walks through it.
A homeowner in Phoenix asks ChatGPT who buys houses for cash nearby, gets four company names, and calls two before lunch. A brokerage, a listings portal, and a cash-offer startup all want to know if they were in that answer, and in Tucson's, and in Dallas's. In our Zillow citation study, brand-owned sites were cited in 76.40% of recommendation answers on ChatGPT and Google AI Mode.
Knowing which answers, city by city, is where the tools differ. We read the pages of every tool on our competitor leaderboard that tracks both engines and has a public pricing page, and kept eight. None of them documents tracking by metro, so each entry says what its pages prove and what to make the vendor prove in the demo.
Five Things a Real Estate Team Needs a Tool to Show
Real estate is bought, rented, and financed one city at a time, and that turns one visibility question into five:
Metro prompts. Questions tracked and reported by metro, so a strong national number can't hide the cities where you're absent. No tool on this list documents it. Any tool that runs your own prompts can run one with a city in it; none documents reporting by metro.
Per-country tracking. The same questions in more than one country. It matters to portals and proptech brands operating across borders. A country is not a metro, and it is not an office.
Several brands in one account. For franchise groups, portal families, and agencies with several real estate clients. Brands are not offices either.
Citation sources. Which portals, lender pages, government pages, and listings the answer cited. Only three tools here quote URL-level detail.
Competitor share of voice. Which agents, portals, lenders, or cash buyers the engine named beside you, and how often.
Every tool below cleared two bars first: its own pages say it tracks both ChatGPT and Google AI Mode, and its pricing is public or stated as a quote. Past that, each criterion is in one of three states:
Documented: a line on the vendor's own page says it. Shortlist on it, then check it sits on the plan you would buy.
Documented as not offered: the vendor says no. That rules it out on the criterion. No tool here is in this state on any of the five.
Not documented: the pages don't say either way. That is a demo question, never a no.
Qvery is ours, so it sits at the top by our own rule. The other seven are the five highest-ranked tools on our competitor leaderboard that cleared both bars, plus AthenaHQ and Superlines, and they appear in order of how many of the five criteria their pages document. For setting up the measurement itself, measuring a real estate brand's AI visibility covers the method.
1. Qvery: Daily Tracking on Both Engines, Without Metro Reports
Key Features:
Daily tracking of visibility, share of voice, and average rank across ChatGPT and Google AI Mode, in 200+ countries.
Share of voice measured against the other brands named in the same answers.
Every citation captured daily, tied to the query and engine that produced it.
Queries you add and edit, so each metro question can sit in your tracked set.
Qvery Assistant in the app: ask about your own visibility, share of voice, citation, topic, and query data in plain language, and have it add queries, trigger a data run, or export a report.
Pricing:
Starter: €49/month for 1 brand and 25 tracked queries.
Growth: €99/month for 1 brand and 50 tracked queries.
Business: €199 for unlimited brands and 100 tracked queries (the pricing page shows no billing period on this tier).
Every plan includes ChatGPT and Google AI Mode, daily query runs, unlimited countries, and unlimited seats. The paid plans start with a free 7-day trial, no credit card required.
Reddit Score: 85.0% Positive, across 20 mentions. What redditors say:
“tracking mentions in local publications and external sites is key for AI visibility, like Qvery AI does.” (r/smallbusiness)
Only two of those 20 mentions come from people outside our own marketing work, too few to score on their own, so read the percentage as ours.
Start with what Qvery doesn't document, because this is our product and you should hear it from us first. It doesn't document metro reporting or separating offices and teams inside one account. You can add a question with a city in it, and the reporting is by query.
What it does document: daily visibility, share of voice, and average rank on both engines, in 200+ countries, with every citation tied to the query and engine behind it. Several brands in one account come with the Business plan, which lists unlimited brands.
That fits a small marketing team at a brokerage or a proptech company that wants to ask the Assistant which of its questions it is losing, rather than build a report. A national portal with an enterprise procurement process is better served further down this list. To run your own metro questions on both engines, start a free 7-day trial; no credit card is required.
2. Peec AI: URL-Level Sources, With the Plan Question Open
Key Features:
Tracking across all countries, per its home page.
Multi-brand tracking, separately for each brand from one dashboard.
URL-level sources: “which URLs and domains the engine drew on” for each answer.
Competitor share of voice: “Percentage of your brand mentions in AI responses compared to all tracked brands mentioned.”
Daily tracking frequency and unlimited users on every priced plan.
Pricing:
Starter: $95/mo for 50 prompts, 3 models, and 1 project.
Pro: $245/mo for 150 prompts, 3 models, and 2 projects.
Advanced: $495/mo for 350 prompts, 3 models, 5 projects, and multi country.
Enterprise: custom, billed annually, with a choice from all models.
Reddit Score: 68.6% Positive, across 51 mentions about Peec AI. What redditors say:
“I have only tested Peec and have been very satisfied.” (r/SaaS)
“We use Peec AI and it's the best tool out there IMO.” (r/AskMarketing)
Peec AI documents four of the five criteria, tied with Qvery, AthenaHQ, and Superlines for the most on this list, and it quotes URL-level sources, which is what a brokerage needs to see its own agent and listing pages in an answer. Metro reporting is the one it doesn't document.
Two plan details matter here. Its AI-instructions page says ChatGPT and Google AI Mode are included by default in every plan, while each priced plan reads “Choose 3 models”; the demo settles which it is. And “Multi country” first appears on the Advanced plan, so a portal working in several countries should price Advanced.
3. AthenaHQ: Brands and Markets, Priced in Credits
Key Features:
Operation across brands and markets: “Global Scale Operate across brands, markets, and models.”
Tracking across multiple brands and business units, centralized in one account.
Source intelligence: “Reveal the sources shaping AI answers.”
Competitor share of voice comparison, and an API.
Pricing:
Essential: free, with 300 credits; its engine list doesn't include Google AI Mode.
Starter: $295/month for 3,600 credits (1 credit = 1 AI response), with ChatGPT and AI Mode; API access and extra credits are paid add-ons.
Enterprise: custom credits, with multi-region and multi-language support.
Reddit Score: 57.1% Positive, across 7 mentions about AthenaHQ. What redditors say:
“We discovered both athena and peec scrape API data and are not giving any insights at all” (r/SaaS)
Seven mentions is a thin base, and this one is a single agency's experience, so weigh it as one opinion.
AthenaHQ documents four criteria: markets, several brands, cited sources, and competitor share of voice. Its sources are described as sources, not URLs, so a team that needs the exact listing page should ask to see one in the demo.
The plan detail is regional. The comparison table lists multi-region support as “Single” on Starter and “Multiple” on Enterprise, and Google AI Mode first appears on Starter, not on the free tier. A portal in several countries is pricing Enterprise, which is a quote, and a team running many metros should do the credit arithmetic before the call.
4. Superlines: Brands by the Plan, Three Engine Picks
Key Features:
Market-specific tracking across regions and languages, with unlimited countries on every plan.
Several brands per plan: 1 on Starter, 3 on Pro, 7 on Growth, and unlimited on Enterprise.
Share of mentions versus competitors, with trend data and unlimited competitor tracking.
Every source clearly labeled in the monitored answers.
Daily prompt frequency, data exports from Pro, and API access from Growth.
Pricing:
Starter: €79/month, or €69/month billed annually, for 50 prompts and 1 brand.
Pro: €199/month, or €175/month billed annually, for 150 prompts and 3 brands.
Growth: €379/month, or €333/month billed annually, for 300 prompts and 7 brands.
Enterprise: tailored pricing, with up to 10 answer engines and unlimited brands.
Starter, Pro, and Growth each track any three answer engines you pick.
Reddit Score: Not scored. One mention about Superlines turned up in the threads we read, which is not enough for a percentage.
Superlines documents four criteria, and its plan table prints the brand count on every plan. A franchise group or portal family can price its exact brand count without a call.
The catch is the engine picks. Starter, Pro, and Growth each track three answer engines of your choosing, so two of the three have to be ChatGPT and Google AI Mode. Its sources are labeled rather than shown as URLs, and metro reporting beyond market-level tracking isn't documented.
5. OtterlyAI: Markets and URLs, Plus an Add-On
Key Features:
Market-by-market performance, with multi-country support (50+) on every plan.
Several brands and clients in Workspaces, with 1 workspace on Lite and unlimited workspaces on Standard and Premium.
Every domain and URL cited in AI answers, checked daily, with link-position changes.
Daily tracking frequency, per the pricing page.
Pricing:
Lite: $29/month, or $25/month billed annually, for 15 search prompts.
Standard: $189/month, or $160/month billed annually, for 100 search prompts.
Premium: $489/month, or $422/month billed annually, for 400 search prompts.
Enterprise: custom pricing.
Google AI Mode is an add-on at $9, $59, or $149 a month on Lite, Standard, and Premium, so both engines start at $38, $248, or $638 a month.
Reddit Score: 69.2% Positive, across 13 mentions about OtterlyAI. What redditors say:
“Otterly/SE Ranking combo wins for SaaS dashboards” (r/SaaS)
“tools like Semrush AI Overview and OtterlyAI help monitor AI citations but full SEO integration lags.” (r/digital_marketing)
OtterlyAI documents markets, several brands, and URL-level citations, which covers the listing-page question well. Competitor share of voice and metro reporting aren't documented.
Google AI Mode costs extra. Its plans track ChatGPT but not Google AI Mode, which costs extra, so the number to compare is the total with the add-on. A brokerage can start at $38 a month for both engines, as long as 15 prompts cover its metros (they won't cover many).
6. Profound: Several Brands, Enterprise Only
Key Features:
Agency Mode: create and manage several brand environments in one account.
Citation analysis: “See which websites influence AI answers about your brand”.
Answer Engine Insights, which track how answer engines mention, rank, and describe a brand.
Pricing:
Trial: free, with limited credits and 50 prompts run daily for 7 days on three engines, none of them Google AI Mode, in one region.
Enterprise: custom, with a tailored prompt tracking plan, up to 9 answer engines, SSO/SAML, and SOC 2 compliance.
Reddit Score: Not scored. One mention about Profound turned up in the threads we read.
Profound documents several brands and the websites behind an answer. Per-country tracking, competitor share of voice, and metro reporting aren't documented, and its sources are websites rather than URLs.
The trial won't answer the Google half: it runs three engines, none of them Google AI Mode, in one region. A national portal with a security review can take that into an Enterprise conversation; a single-office brokerage will find it more procurement than it needs.
7. Ahrefs: URLs and Answer Text, Priced as a Bundle
Key Features:
The specific URLs most frequently cited alongside your brand.
Raw responses stored, searchable for brand mentions and linked citations.
AI Mode share of voice against any competitor you choose.
Daily monitoring of mentions and citations.
Pricing:
Brand Radar AI from $199/mo.
Lite: $129/mo with 5 tracked AI prompts.
Standard: $249/mo with 10 tracked AI prompts.
Advanced: $449/mo with 20 tracked AI prompts.
Enterprise: $1,499/mo, annual commitment required.
Reddit Score: 48.3% Positive, across 378 mentions about Ahrefs. What redditors say:
“I use AHREFs and I recommend that to everyone. :)” (r/SEO)
“Must have been almost a decade ago when Ahrefs upped their prices and I left.” (r/SEO)
Ahrefs documents URL-level citations and competitor share of voice, and it is the only tool here that says it stores the raw answer text. When an engine describes your agents or fees wrong, that text is the evidence. Per-country tracking, several brands, and metro reporting aren't documented.
Brand Radar is sold standalone, with an Ahrefs Free account, but the pricing page doesn't say which plan runs daily prompts on both engines, so the demo question is the bundle and its total.
8. Scrunch: A Leaderboard Pick, Google AI Mode on Enterprise
Key Features:
Citations and sources, listed as a row on its pricing page.
Competitor tracking: 5 competitors on Core, custom on Enterprise.
Country coverage by plan: 1 country on Core, unlimited on Enterprise.
Filtering by AI platform, with ChatGPT and Google AI Mode among those its FAQ names.
Pricing:
Core: $250/mo for 125 unique prompts, 1 brand workspace, 1 country, and four LLMs, with ChatGPT among them and Google AI Mode not.
Enterprise: custom prompts and brand workspaces, unlimited countries, and nine LLMs including Google AI Mode; no price is published.
Reddit Score: 50.0% Positive, across 5 mentions about Scrunch. Four of the five are posts comparing several tools, and the only comment was written by an employee of a rival vendor, so there is no user review to quote.
Scrunch is here because it ranks sixth on our competitor leaderboard, among the five highest that cleared both bars. Its pricing rows document cited sources and competitor tracking, and country coverage on Enterprise.
Core and Enterprise differ on the two things real estate needs. Core tracks one country and doesn't list Google AI Mode, so a team that needs both engines, or more than one country, is pricing Enterprise. Several brands come only on Enterprise, as custom brand workspaces, and metro reporting isn't documented on either plan.
Three Question Sets to Run in Every Demo
Nothing in this review ran these in any tool; they are the tests to make each vendor run, with your metro added to every question.
Brokerage: "top real estate agent services" and "services for selling a house", each with your metro added, for every metro and office you serve.
Portal: "best home value estimate apps", "apps to check what homes sold for in my neighborhood", and "top rental search apps", each with your metro.
Proptech: "find me companies that buy houses as-is for cash", "best lenders for home loans", and "best companies to manage rental properties", each with your metro.
In every set, check six things:
Each metro is reported on its own line, not folded into one national number.
The tool shows whether your brand is recommended, not only mentioned or cited.
Each cited source sits beside its answer, down to the URL if you need the listing or agent page.
ChatGPT and Google AI Mode both run on the plan you would buy, and read separately.
The competitors named instead of you are listed.
For brokerages, offices or teams can be separated inside one account. No tool here documents that.
The Limits of This Review
This is a reading of each vendor's own pages in September 2026, with prices re-checked on the live pricing pages on September 22. We ran no product trials and measured no outcomes, so nothing here says how well any tool performs for a brokerage, portal, or proptech brand.
Metro reporting, office separation, and the three question sets are gaps to test, not findings about any tool. A Reddit score says how people talk about a tool, not whether it fits real estate or measures correctly.
Before You Sign
Name the criteria your team needs, shortlist the tools whose own pages document them, and then make every shortlisted vendor run your metro questions on both engines, on the plan you would buy, and show whether your brand is recommended before you sign. If you want the measurement running first, the real estate AI visibility guide walks through it.
A homeowner in Phoenix asks ChatGPT who buys houses for cash nearby, gets four company names, and calls two before lunch. A brokerage, a listings portal, and a cash-offer startup all want to know if they were in that answer, and in Tucson's, and in Dallas's. In our Zillow citation study, brand-owned sites were cited in 76.40% of recommendation answers on ChatGPT and Google AI Mode.
Knowing which answers, city by city, is where the tools differ. We read the pages of every tool on our competitor leaderboard that tracks both engines and has a public pricing page, and kept eight. None of them documents tracking by metro, so each entry says what its pages prove and what to make the vendor prove in the demo.
Five Things a Real Estate Team Needs a Tool to Show
Real estate is bought, rented, and financed one city at a time, and that turns one visibility question into five:
Metro prompts. Questions tracked and reported by metro, so a strong national number can't hide the cities where you're absent. No tool on this list documents it. Any tool that runs your own prompts can run one with a city in it; none documents reporting by metro.
Per-country tracking. The same questions in more than one country. It matters to portals and proptech brands operating across borders. A country is not a metro, and it is not an office.
Several brands in one account. For franchise groups, portal families, and agencies with several real estate clients. Brands are not offices either.
Citation sources. Which portals, lender pages, government pages, and listings the answer cited. Only three tools here quote URL-level detail.
Competitor share of voice. Which agents, portals, lenders, or cash buyers the engine named beside you, and how often.
Every tool below cleared two bars first: its own pages say it tracks both ChatGPT and Google AI Mode, and its pricing is public or stated as a quote. Past that, each criterion is in one of three states:
Documented: a line on the vendor's own page says it. Shortlist on it, then check it sits on the plan you would buy.
Documented as not offered: the vendor says no. That rules it out on the criterion. No tool here is in this state on any of the five.
Not documented: the pages don't say either way. That is a demo question, never a no.
Qvery is ours, so it sits at the top by our own rule. The other seven are the five highest-ranked tools on our competitor leaderboard that cleared both bars, plus AthenaHQ and Superlines, and they appear in order of how many of the five criteria their pages document. For setting up the measurement itself, measuring a real estate brand's AI visibility covers the method.
1. Qvery: Daily Tracking on Both Engines, Without Metro Reports
Key Features:
Daily tracking of visibility, share of voice, and average rank across ChatGPT and Google AI Mode, in 200+ countries.
Share of voice measured against the other brands named in the same answers.
Every citation captured daily, tied to the query and engine that produced it.
Queries you add and edit, so each metro question can sit in your tracked set.
Qvery Assistant in the app: ask about your own visibility, share of voice, citation, topic, and query data in plain language, and have it add queries, trigger a data run, or export a report.
Pricing:
Starter: €49/month for 1 brand and 25 tracked queries.
Growth: €99/month for 1 brand and 50 tracked queries.
Business: €199 for unlimited brands and 100 tracked queries (the pricing page shows no billing period on this tier).
Every plan includes ChatGPT and Google AI Mode, daily query runs, unlimited countries, and unlimited seats. The paid plans start with a free 7-day trial, no credit card required.
Reddit Score: 85.0% Positive, across 20 mentions. What redditors say:
“tracking mentions in local publications and external sites is key for AI visibility, like Qvery AI does.” (r/smallbusiness)
Only two of those 20 mentions come from people outside our own marketing work, too few to score on their own, so read the percentage as ours.
Start with what Qvery doesn't document, because this is our product and you should hear it from us first. It doesn't document metro reporting or separating offices and teams inside one account. You can add a question with a city in it, and the reporting is by query.
What it does document: daily visibility, share of voice, and average rank on both engines, in 200+ countries, with every citation tied to the query and engine behind it. Several brands in one account come with the Business plan, which lists unlimited brands.
That fits a small marketing team at a brokerage or a proptech company that wants to ask the Assistant which of its questions it is losing, rather than build a report. A national portal with an enterprise procurement process is better served further down this list. To run your own metro questions on both engines, start a free 7-day trial; no credit card is required.
2. Peec AI: URL-Level Sources, With the Plan Question Open
Key Features:
Tracking across all countries, per its home page.
Multi-brand tracking, separately for each brand from one dashboard.
URL-level sources: “which URLs and domains the engine drew on” for each answer.
Competitor share of voice: “Percentage of your brand mentions in AI responses compared to all tracked brands mentioned.”
Daily tracking frequency and unlimited users on every priced plan.
Pricing:
Starter: $95/mo for 50 prompts, 3 models, and 1 project.
Pro: $245/mo for 150 prompts, 3 models, and 2 projects.
Advanced: $495/mo for 350 prompts, 3 models, 5 projects, and multi country.
Enterprise: custom, billed annually, with a choice from all models.
Reddit Score: 68.6% Positive, across 51 mentions about Peec AI. What redditors say:
“I have only tested Peec and have been very satisfied.” (r/SaaS)
“We use Peec AI and it's the best tool out there IMO.” (r/AskMarketing)
Peec AI documents four of the five criteria, tied with Qvery, AthenaHQ, and Superlines for the most on this list, and it quotes URL-level sources, which is what a brokerage needs to see its own agent and listing pages in an answer. Metro reporting is the one it doesn't document.
Two plan details matter here. Its AI-instructions page says ChatGPT and Google AI Mode are included by default in every plan, while each priced plan reads “Choose 3 models”; the demo settles which it is. And “Multi country” first appears on the Advanced plan, so a portal working in several countries should price Advanced.
3. AthenaHQ: Brands and Markets, Priced in Credits
Key Features:
Operation across brands and markets: “Global Scale Operate across brands, markets, and models.”
Tracking across multiple brands and business units, centralized in one account.
Source intelligence: “Reveal the sources shaping AI answers.”
Competitor share of voice comparison, and an API.
Pricing:
Essential: free, with 300 credits; its engine list doesn't include Google AI Mode.
Starter: $295/month for 3,600 credits (1 credit = 1 AI response), with ChatGPT and AI Mode; API access and extra credits are paid add-ons.
Enterprise: custom credits, with multi-region and multi-language support.
Reddit Score: 57.1% Positive, across 7 mentions about AthenaHQ. What redditors say:
“We discovered both athena and peec scrape API data and are not giving any insights at all” (r/SaaS)
Seven mentions is a thin base, and this one is a single agency's experience, so weigh it as one opinion.
AthenaHQ documents four criteria: markets, several brands, cited sources, and competitor share of voice. Its sources are described as sources, not URLs, so a team that needs the exact listing page should ask to see one in the demo.
The plan detail is regional. The comparison table lists multi-region support as “Single” on Starter and “Multiple” on Enterprise, and Google AI Mode first appears on Starter, not on the free tier. A portal in several countries is pricing Enterprise, which is a quote, and a team running many metros should do the credit arithmetic before the call.
4. Superlines: Brands by the Plan, Three Engine Picks
Key Features:
Market-specific tracking across regions and languages, with unlimited countries on every plan.
Several brands per plan: 1 on Starter, 3 on Pro, 7 on Growth, and unlimited on Enterprise.
Share of mentions versus competitors, with trend data and unlimited competitor tracking.
Every source clearly labeled in the monitored answers.
Daily prompt frequency, data exports from Pro, and API access from Growth.
Pricing:
Starter: €79/month, or €69/month billed annually, for 50 prompts and 1 brand.
Pro: €199/month, or €175/month billed annually, for 150 prompts and 3 brands.
Growth: €379/month, or €333/month billed annually, for 300 prompts and 7 brands.
Enterprise: tailored pricing, with up to 10 answer engines and unlimited brands.
Starter, Pro, and Growth each track any three answer engines you pick.
Reddit Score: Not scored. One mention about Superlines turned up in the threads we read, which is not enough for a percentage.
Superlines documents four criteria, and its plan table prints the brand count on every plan. A franchise group or portal family can price its exact brand count without a call.
The catch is the engine picks. Starter, Pro, and Growth each track three answer engines of your choosing, so two of the three have to be ChatGPT and Google AI Mode. Its sources are labeled rather than shown as URLs, and metro reporting beyond market-level tracking isn't documented.
5. OtterlyAI: Markets and URLs, Plus an Add-On
Key Features:
Market-by-market performance, with multi-country support (50+) on every plan.
Several brands and clients in Workspaces, with 1 workspace on Lite and unlimited workspaces on Standard and Premium.
Every domain and URL cited in AI answers, checked daily, with link-position changes.
Daily tracking frequency, per the pricing page.
Pricing:
Lite: $29/month, or $25/month billed annually, for 15 search prompts.
Standard: $189/month, or $160/month billed annually, for 100 search prompts.
Premium: $489/month, or $422/month billed annually, for 400 search prompts.
Enterprise: custom pricing.
Google AI Mode is an add-on at $9, $59, or $149 a month on Lite, Standard, and Premium, so both engines start at $38, $248, or $638 a month.
Reddit Score: 69.2% Positive, across 13 mentions about OtterlyAI. What redditors say:
“Otterly/SE Ranking combo wins for SaaS dashboards” (r/SaaS)
“tools like Semrush AI Overview and OtterlyAI help monitor AI citations but full SEO integration lags.” (r/digital_marketing)
OtterlyAI documents markets, several brands, and URL-level citations, which covers the listing-page question well. Competitor share of voice and metro reporting aren't documented.
Google AI Mode costs extra. Its plans track ChatGPT but not Google AI Mode, which costs extra, so the number to compare is the total with the add-on. A brokerage can start at $38 a month for both engines, as long as 15 prompts cover its metros (they won't cover many).
6. Profound: Several Brands, Enterprise Only
Key Features:
Agency Mode: create and manage several brand environments in one account.
Citation analysis: “See which websites influence AI answers about your brand”.
Answer Engine Insights, which track how answer engines mention, rank, and describe a brand.
Pricing:
Trial: free, with limited credits and 50 prompts run daily for 7 days on three engines, none of them Google AI Mode, in one region.
Enterprise: custom, with a tailored prompt tracking plan, up to 9 answer engines, SSO/SAML, and SOC 2 compliance.
Reddit Score: Not scored. One mention about Profound turned up in the threads we read.
Profound documents several brands and the websites behind an answer. Per-country tracking, competitor share of voice, and metro reporting aren't documented, and its sources are websites rather than URLs.
The trial won't answer the Google half: it runs three engines, none of them Google AI Mode, in one region. A national portal with a security review can take that into an Enterprise conversation; a single-office brokerage will find it more procurement than it needs.
7. Ahrefs: URLs and Answer Text, Priced as a Bundle
Key Features:
The specific URLs most frequently cited alongside your brand.
Raw responses stored, searchable for brand mentions and linked citations.
AI Mode share of voice against any competitor you choose.
Daily monitoring of mentions and citations.
Pricing:
Brand Radar AI from $199/mo.
Lite: $129/mo with 5 tracked AI prompts.
Standard: $249/mo with 10 tracked AI prompts.
Advanced: $449/mo with 20 tracked AI prompts.
Enterprise: $1,499/mo, annual commitment required.
Reddit Score: 48.3% Positive, across 378 mentions about Ahrefs. What redditors say:
“I use AHREFs and I recommend that to everyone. :)” (r/SEO)
“Must have been almost a decade ago when Ahrefs upped their prices and I left.” (r/SEO)
Ahrefs documents URL-level citations and competitor share of voice, and it is the only tool here that says it stores the raw answer text. When an engine describes your agents or fees wrong, that text is the evidence. Per-country tracking, several brands, and metro reporting aren't documented.
Brand Radar is sold standalone, with an Ahrefs Free account, but the pricing page doesn't say which plan runs daily prompts on both engines, so the demo question is the bundle and its total.
8. Scrunch: A Leaderboard Pick, Google AI Mode on Enterprise
Key Features:
Citations and sources, listed as a row on its pricing page.
Competitor tracking: 5 competitors on Core, custom on Enterprise.
Country coverage by plan: 1 country on Core, unlimited on Enterprise.
Filtering by AI platform, with ChatGPT and Google AI Mode among those its FAQ names.
Pricing:
Core: $250/mo for 125 unique prompts, 1 brand workspace, 1 country, and four LLMs, with ChatGPT among them and Google AI Mode not.
Enterprise: custom prompts and brand workspaces, unlimited countries, and nine LLMs including Google AI Mode; no price is published.
Reddit Score: 50.0% Positive, across 5 mentions about Scrunch. Four of the five are posts comparing several tools, and the only comment was written by an employee of a rival vendor, so there is no user review to quote.
Scrunch is here because it ranks sixth on our competitor leaderboard, among the five highest that cleared both bars. Its pricing rows document cited sources and competitor tracking, and country coverage on Enterprise.
Core and Enterprise differ on the two things real estate needs. Core tracks one country and doesn't list Google AI Mode, so a team that needs both engines, or more than one country, is pricing Enterprise. Several brands come only on Enterprise, as custom brand workspaces, and metro reporting isn't documented on either plan.
Three Question Sets to Run in Every Demo
Nothing in this review ran these in any tool; they are the tests to make each vendor run, with your metro added to every question.
Brokerage: "top real estate agent services" and "services for selling a house", each with your metro added, for every metro and office you serve.
Portal: "best home value estimate apps", "apps to check what homes sold for in my neighborhood", and "top rental search apps", each with your metro.
Proptech: "find me companies that buy houses as-is for cash", "best lenders for home loans", and "best companies to manage rental properties", each with your metro.
In every set, check six things:
Each metro is reported on its own line, not folded into one national number.
The tool shows whether your brand is recommended, not only mentioned or cited.
Each cited source sits beside its answer, down to the URL if you need the listing or agent page.
ChatGPT and Google AI Mode both run on the plan you would buy, and read separately.
The competitors named instead of you are listed.
For brokerages, offices or teams can be separated inside one account. No tool here documents that.
The Limits of This Review
This is a reading of each vendor's own pages in September 2026, with prices re-checked on the live pricing pages on September 22. We ran no product trials and measured no outcomes, so nothing here says how well any tool performs for a brokerage, portal, or proptech brand.
Metro reporting, office separation, and the three question sets are gaps to test, not findings about any tool. A Reddit score says how people talk about a tool, not whether it fits real estate or measures correctly.
Before You Sign
Name the criteria your team needs, shortlist the tools whose own pages document them, and then make every shortlisted vendor run your metro questions on both engines, on the plan you would buy, and show whether your brand is recommended before you sign. If you want the measurement running first, the real estate AI visibility guide walks through it.
A homeowner in Phoenix asks ChatGPT who buys houses for cash nearby, gets four company names, and calls two before lunch. A brokerage, a listings portal, and a cash-offer startup all want to know if they were in that answer, and in Tucson's, and in Dallas's. In our Zillow citation study, brand-owned sites were cited in 76.40% of recommendation answers on ChatGPT and Google AI Mode.
Knowing which answers, city by city, is where the tools differ. We read the pages of every tool on our competitor leaderboard that tracks both engines and has a public pricing page, and kept eight. None of them documents tracking by metro, so each entry says what its pages prove and what to make the vendor prove in the demo.
Five Things a Real Estate Team Needs a Tool to Show
Real estate is bought, rented, and financed one city at a time, and that turns one visibility question into five:
Metro prompts. Questions tracked and reported by metro, so a strong national number can't hide the cities where you're absent. No tool on this list documents it. Any tool that runs your own prompts can run one with a city in it; none documents reporting by metro.
Per-country tracking. The same questions in more than one country. It matters to portals and proptech brands operating across borders. A country is not a metro, and it is not an office.
Several brands in one account. For franchise groups, portal families, and agencies with several real estate clients. Brands are not offices either.
Citation sources. Which portals, lender pages, government pages, and listings the answer cited. Only three tools here quote URL-level detail.
Competitor share of voice. Which agents, portals, lenders, or cash buyers the engine named beside you, and how often.
Every tool below cleared two bars first: its own pages say it tracks both ChatGPT and Google AI Mode, and its pricing is public or stated as a quote. Past that, each criterion is in one of three states:
Documented: a line on the vendor's own page says it. Shortlist on it, then check it sits on the plan you would buy.
Documented as not offered: the vendor says no. That rules it out on the criterion. No tool here is in this state on any of the five.
Not documented: the pages don't say either way. That is a demo question, never a no.
Qvery is ours, so it sits at the top by our own rule. The other seven are the five highest-ranked tools on our competitor leaderboard that cleared both bars, plus AthenaHQ and Superlines, and they appear in order of how many of the five criteria their pages document. For setting up the measurement itself, measuring a real estate brand's AI visibility covers the method.
1. Qvery: Daily Tracking on Both Engines, Without Metro Reports
Key Features:
Daily tracking of visibility, share of voice, and average rank across ChatGPT and Google AI Mode, in 200+ countries.
Share of voice measured against the other brands named in the same answers.
Every citation captured daily, tied to the query and engine that produced it.
Queries you add and edit, so each metro question can sit in your tracked set.
Qvery Assistant in the app: ask about your own visibility, share of voice, citation, topic, and query data in plain language, and have it add queries, trigger a data run, or export a report.
Pricing:
Starter: €49/month for 1 brand and 25 tracked queries.
Growth: €99/month for 1 brand and 50 tracked queries.
Business: €199 for unlimited brands and 100 tracked queries (the pricing page shows no billing period on this tier).
Every plan includes ChatGPT and Google AI Mode, daily query runs, unlimited countries, and unlimited seats. The paid plans start with a free 7-day trial, no credit card required.
Reddit Score: 85.0% Positive, across 20 mentions. What redditors say:
“tracking mentions in local publications and external sites is key for AI visibility, like Qvery AI does.” (r/smallbusiness)
Only two of those 20 mentions come from people outside our own marketing work, too few to score on their own, so read the percentage as ours.
Start with what Qvery doesn't document, because this is our product and you should hear it from us first. It doesn't document metro reporting or separating offices and teams inside one account. You can add a question with a city in it, and the reporting is by query.
What it does document: daily visibility, share of voice, and average rank on both engines, in 200+ countries, with every citation tied to the query and engine behind it. Several brands in one account come with the Business plan, which lists unlimited brands.
That fits a small marketing team at a brokerage or a proptech company that wants to ask the Assistant which of its questions it is losing, rather than build a report. A national portal with an enterprise procurement process is better served further down this list. To run your own metro questions on both engines, start a free 7-day trial; no credit card is required.
2. Peec AI: URL-Level Sources, With the Plan Question Open
Key Features:
Tracking across all countries, per its home page.
Multi-brand tracking, separately for each brand from one dashboard.
URL-level sources: “which URLs and domains the engine drew on” for each answer.
Competitor share of voice: “Percentage of your brand mentions in AI responses compared to all tracked brands mentioned.”
Daily tracking frequency and unlimited users on every priced plan.
Pricing:
Starter: $95/mo for 50 prompts, 3 models, and 1 project.
Pro: $245/mo for 150 prompts, 3 models, and 2 projects.
Advanced: $495/mo for 350 prompts, 3 models, 5 projects, and multi country.
Enterprise: custom, billed annually, with a choice from all models.
Reddit Score: 68.6% Positive, across 51 mentions about Peec AI. What redditors say:
“I have only tested Peec and have been very satisfied.” (r/SaaS)
“We use Peec AI and it's the best tool out there IMO.” (r/AskMarketing)
Peec AI documents four of the five criteria, tied with Qvery, AthenaHQ, and Superlines for the most on this list, and it quotes URL-level sources, which is what a brokerage needs to see its own agent and listing pages in an answer. Metro reporting is the one it doesn't document.
Two plan details matter here. Its AI-instructions page says ChatGPT and Google AI Mode are included by default in every plan, while each priced plan reads “Choose 3 models”; the demo settles which it is. And “Multi country” first appears on the Advanced plan, so a portal working in several countries should price Advanced.
3. AthenaHQ: Brands and Markets, Priced in Credits
Key Features:
Operation across brands and markets: “Global Scale Operate across brands, markets, and models.”
Tracking across multiple brands and business units, centralized in one account.
Source intelligence: “Reveal the sources shaping AI answers.”
Competitor share of voice comparison, and an API.
Pricing:
Essential: free, with 300 credits; its engine list doesn't include Google AI Mode.
Starter: $295/month for 3,600 credits (1 credit = 1 AI response), with ChatGPT and AI Mode; API access and extra credits are paid add-ons.
Enterprise: custom credits, with multi-region and multi-language support.
Reddit Score: 57.1% Positive, across 7 mentions about AthenaHQ. What redditors say:
“We discovered both athena and peec scrape API data and are not giving any insights at all” (r/SaaS)
Seven mentions is a thin base, and this one is a single agency's experience, so weigh it as one opinion.
AthenaHQ documents four criteria: markets, several brands, cited sources, and competitor share of voice. Its sources are described as sources, not URLs, so a team that needs the exact listing page should ask to see one in the demo.
The plan detail is regional. The comparison table lists multi-region support as “Single” on Starter and “Multiple” on Enterprise, and Google AI Mode first appears on Starter, not on the free tier. A portal in several countries is pricing Enterprise, which is a quote, and a team running many metros should do the credit arithmetic before the call.
4. Superlines: Brands by the Plan, Three Engine Picks
Key Features:
Market-specific tracking across regions and languages, with unlimited countries on every plan.
Several brands per plan: 1 on Starter, 3 on Pro, 7 on Growth, and unlimited on Enterprise.
Share of mentions versus competitors, with trend data and unlimited competitor tracking.
Every source clearly labeled in the monitored answers.
Daily prompt frequency, data exports from Pro, and API access from Growth.
Pricing:
Starter: €79/month, or €69/month billed annually, for 50 prompts and 1 brand.
Pro: €199/month, or €175/month billed annually, for 150 prompts and 3 brands.
Growth: €379/month, or €333/month billed annually, for 300 prompts and 7 brands.
Enterprise: tailored pricing, with up to 10 answer engines and unlimited brands.
Starter, Pro, and Growth each track any three answer engines you pick.
Reddit Score: Not scored. One mention about Superlines turned up in the threads we read, which is not enough for a percentage.
Superlines documents four criteria, and its plan table prints the brand count on every plan. A franchise group or portal family can price its exact brand count without a call.
The catch is the engine picks. Starter, Pro, and Growth each track three answer engines of your choosing, so two of the three have to be ChatGPT and Google AI Mode. Its sources are labeled rather than shown as URLs, and metro reporting beyond market-level tracking isn't documented.
5. OtterlyAI: Markets and URLs, Plus an Add-On
Key Features:
Market-by-market performance, with multi-country support (50+) on every plan.
Several brands and clients in Workspaces, with 1 workspace on Lite and unlimited workspaces on Standard and Premium.
Every domain and URL cited in AI answers, checked daily, with link-position changes.
Daily tracking frequency, per the pricing page.
Pricing:
Lite: $29/month, or $25/month billed annually, for 15 search prompts.
Standard: $189/month, or $160/month billed annually, for 100 search prompts.
Premium: $489/month, or $422/month billed annually, for 400 search prompts.
Enterprise: custom pricing.
Google AI Mode is an add-on at $9, $59, or $149 a month on Lite, Standard, and Premium, so both engines start at $38, $248, or $638 a month.
Reddit Score: 69.2% Positive, across 13 mentions about OtterlyAI. What redditors say:
“Otterly/SE Ranking combo wins for SaaS dashboards” (r/SaaS)
“tools like Semrush AI Overview and OtterlyAI help monitor AI citations but full SEO integration lags.” (r/digital_marketing)
OtterlyAI documents markets, several brands, and URL-level citations, which covers the listing-page question well. Competitor share of voice and metro reporting aren't documented.
Google AI Mode costs extra. Its plans track ChatGPT but not Google AI Mode, which costs extra, so the number to compare is the total with the add-on. A brokerage can start at $38 a month for both engines, as long as 15 prompts cover its metros (they won't cover many).
6. Profound: Several Brands, Enterprise Only
Key Features:
Agency Mode: create and manage several brand environments in one account.
Citation analysis: “See which websites influence AI answers about your brand”.
Answer Engine Insights, which track how answer engines mention, rank, and describe a brand.
Pricing:
Trial: free, with limited credits and 50 prompts run daily for 7 days on three engines, none of them Google AI Mode, in one region.
Enterprise: custom, with a tailored prompt tracking plan, up to 9 answer engines, SSO/SAML, and SOC 2 compliance.
Reddit Score: Not scored. One mention about Profound turned up in the threads we read.
Profound documents several brands and the websites behind an answer. Per-country tracking, competitor share of voice, and metro reporting aren't documented, and its sources are websites rather than URLs.
The trial won't answer the Google half: it runs three engines, none of them Google AI Mode, in one region. A national portal with a security review can take that into an Enterprise conversation; a single-office brokerage will find it more procurement than it needs.
7. Ahrefs: URLs and Answer Text, Priced as a Bundle
Key Features:
The specific URLs most frequently cited alongside your brand.
Raw responses stored, searchable for brand mentions and linked citations.
AI Mode share of voice against any competitor you choose.
Daily monitoring of mentions and citations.
Pricing:
Brand Radar AI from $199/mo.
Lite: $129/mo with 5 tracked AI prompts.
Standard: $249/mo with 10 tracked AI prompts.
Advanced: $449/mo with 20 tracked AI prompts.
Enterprise: $1,499/mo, annual commitment required.
Reddit Score: 48.3% Positive, across 378 mentions about Ahrefs. What redditors say:
“I use AHREFs and I recommend that to everyone. :)” (r/SEO)
“Must have been almost a decade ago when Ahrefs upped their prices and I left.” (r/SEO)
Ahrefs documents URL-level citations and competitor share of voice, and it is the only tool here that says it stores the raw answer text. When an engine describes your agents or fees wrong, that text is the evidence. Per-country tracking, several brands, and metro reporting aren't documented.
Brand Radar is sold standalone, with an Ahrefs Free account, but the pricing page doesn't say which plan runs daily prompts on both engines, so the demo question is the bundle and its total.
8. Scrunch: A Leaderboard Pick, Google AI Mode on Enterprise
Key Features:
Citations and sources, listed as a row on its pricing page.
Competitor tracking: 5 competitors on Core, custom on Enterprise.
Country coverage by plan: 1 country on Core, unlimited on Enterprise.
Filtering by AI platform, with ChatGPT and Google AI Mode among those its FAQ names.
Pricing:
Core: $250/mo for 125 unique prompts, 1 brand workspace, 1 country, and four LLMs, with ChatGPT among them and Google AI Mode not.
Enterprise: custom prompts and brand workspaces, unlimited countries, and nine LLMs including Google AI Mode; no price is published.
Reddit Score: 50.0% Positive, across 5 mentions about Scrunch. Four of the five are posts comparing several tools, and the only comment was written by an employee of a rival vendor, so there is no user review to quote.
Scrunch is here because it ranks sixth on our competitor leaderboard, among the five highest that cleared both bars. Its pricing rows document cited sources and competitor tracking, and country coverage on Enterprise.
Core and Enterprise differ on the two things real estate needs. Core tracks one country and doesn't list Google AI Mode, so a team that needs both engines, or more than one country, is pricing Enterprise. Several brands come only on Enterprise, as custom brand workspaces, and metro reporting isn't documented on either plan.
Three Question Sets to Run in Every Demo
Nothing in this review ran these in any tool; they are the tests to make each vendor run, with your metro added to every question.
Brokerage: "top real estate agent services" and "services for selling a house", each with your metro added, for every metro and office you serve.
Portal: "best home value estimate apps", "apps to check what homes sold for in my neighborhood", and "top rental search apps", each with your metro.
Proptech: "find me companies that buy houses as-is for cash", "best lenders for home loans", and "best companies to manage rental properties", each with your metro.
In every set, check six things:
Each metro is reported on its own line, not folded into one national number.
The tool shows whether your brand is recommended, not only mentioned or cited.
Each cited source sits beside its answer, down to the URL if you need the listing or agent page.
ChatGPT and Google AI Mode both run on the plan you would buy, and read separately.
The competitors named instead of you are listed.
For brokerages, offices or teams can be separated inside one account. No tool here documents that.
The Limits of This Review
This is a reading of each vendor's own pages in September 2026, with prices re-checked on the live pricing pages on September 22. We ran no product trials and measured no outcomes, so nothing here says how well any tool performs for a brokerage, portal, or proptech brand.
Metro reporting, office separation, and the three question sets are gaps to test, not findings about any tool. A Reddit score says how people talk about a tool, not whether it fits real estate or measures correctly.
Before You Sign
Name the criteria your team needs, shortlist the tools whose own pages document them, and then make every shortlisted vendor run your metro questions on both engines, on the plan you would buy, and show whether your brand is recommended before you sign. If you want the measurement running first, the real estate AI visibility guide walks through it.
© 2026 Qvery AI OÜ