# 8 Best AI Visibility Tools for Healthcare Brands (2026) > Eight AI visibility tools for telehealth, therapy, pharmacy and clinic groups, ranked on whether whoever keeps your payer list can read what ChatGPT and Google AI Mode say about your insurance and prices, and the page behind it. By Vlad Shvets, Partner @ Qvery · Published 2026-09-22 · Updated 2026-11-09 · 13 min read Canonical: https://qvery.ai/blog/best-ai-visibility-tools-for-healthcare-brands/ A new patient who phones a clinic is asked which insurance they have before the appointment is booked. NORC's October 2025 survey found that **27%** of US adults had used AI for health information and another 24% said they might. Qvery makes the first entry, our GEO Agent, as our pick. That makes the job of an AI visibility tool narrower than its dashboard suggests: show whoever keeps your payer list (the insurers you take and your status with each) and self-pay prices what ChatGPT and Google AI Mode said about you, sentence by sentence, and the page each answer cited, on a plan you can buy without a sales call. The order follows vendor pages and prices. ## 1. [GEO Agent by Qvery](https://qvery.ai/geo-agent/): Your Patients' Questions, Asked Daily on Both Engines ![Qvery's GEO Agent page](https://qvery.ai/blog/best-ai-visibility-tools-for-healthcare-brands/screenshot-qvery-geo-agent.webp) *Qvery's GEO Agent page, captured October 15, 2026* - Topics and questions written for you from your brand, your industry and your competitors. - Each question asked every day on ChatGPT and Google AI Mode, in the countries you choose. - Every answer and every citation (the pages an answer drew on) recorded. - Visibility, share of voice and sentiment beside your competitors, by topic and by country. - Qvery Assistant to question your data, edit the question list, start a run or export a report. > 💰 **Pricing** Pricing is not published. **Pros** - Questions written from your own brand and rivals - Every answer and citation kept, both engines, every day **Cons** - ChatGPT and Google AI Mode only - Pricing not published This entry is Qvery's own product, which is the reason it sits first. For a healthcare company, an answer that still lists a plan you left in January sits in that record with its date and the pages it leaned on. The GEO Agent also shows where a competitor is named instead of you and which sources the engines cite for your topics. It covers two engines and no others, and it sets locations by country. It measures and shows you where to work; reading each answer against your payer list is work for your team, or for ours as a service. Qvery's team also builds custom agents and does the optimization work with you, as a service quoted on its own. ## 2. [Peec AI](https://peec.ai/): A Claim-by-Claim Check From a Self-Serve Plan ![The homepage of Peec AI](https://qvery.ai/blog/best-ai-visibility-tools-for-healthcare-brands/screenshot-peec-homepage.webp) *Peec AI's homepage, captured October 18, 2026* - Tags and topics to keep each service line's questions apart. > 💰 **Pricing** > - **Starter:** $95 a month, 50 prompts, 3 models, daily runs, 1 project > - **Pro:** $245 a month, 150 prompts, 2 projects > - **Advanced:** $495 a month, 350 prompts, 5 projects, more than one country > - **Custom plan:** annual, every model, the API Rating: 4.7 / 5 on G2 (21 reviews on G2) **Pros** - Both engines on the cheapest plan - Each contradicted claim arrives with its pages - Claims searchable by a plan's name **Cons** - One country until Advanced - API only on the custom plan - Fact and checked-question allowances not spelled out Peec AI stores every chat with its main response and every URL the model referenced or cited, and its $95 Starter lets you pick ChatGPT and Google AI Mode as two of its three models. No other plan on this list pairs both engines with a check against your own facts at a published price. Its fact-checking is the feature a payer-list owner would design. You enter facts as plain statements, one per line or from a CSV, and Peec splits each tracked answer into claims; every claim comes back supported or contradicted, with the passage, the question, the model and the source pages beside it. Peec gives no verdict to a claim none of your facts covers, so when you leave a plan, the fact to add is that you no longer take it; an answer still claiming the old contract is then contradicted instead of ignored. The plan sets how many facts and checked questions you get, and the pricing page lists those rows without spelling the numbers out in words. Independent discussion of Peec is thin. ## 3. [AthenaHQ](https://www.athenahq.ai/): Both Engines on Starter, a Healthcare Page Behind It ![The homepage of AthenaHQ](https://qvery.ai/blog/best-ai-visibility-tools-for-healthcare-brands/screenshot-athenahq-homepage.webp) *AthenaHQ's homepage, captured October 18, 2026* - One credit buys one AI response. - Knowledge Base and claim review (reading each statement against facts you load) on the custom plan. > 💰 **Pricing** > - **Essential:** no charge, $25 of credit, 300 credits, without Google AI Mode > - **Starter:** $295 a month, 3,600 credits, one region and one language, the API and extra credits as paid add-ons > - **Custom plan:** quoted, with claim review, discrepancy detection, several regions and languages Rating: 4.9 / 5 on G2 (39 reviews on G2) **Pros** - Both engines on the self-serve plan - One credit per answer, so the budget is easy to work out - Says its brand monitoring does not process or store patients' health records **Cons** - Claim review only on a custom plan - One region on Starter - The healthcare page describes outcomes, not how the check works AthenaHQ has a healthcare page of its own. It describes monitoring how AI represents treatments, providers and facilities, tracking each facility, provider group or specialty, and flagging inaccurate medical information, and it answers the compliance question in one line: "AthenaHQ's brand monitoring does not process or store protected health information (PHI)." PHI means patients' health records. Starter is the measuring half. Its 3,600 credits buy 3,600 answers a month across 11 models, ChatGPT and Google AI Mode included, with sources and a CSV export; thirty patient questions asked daily on both engines use 1,800 of them. The checking half, Knowledge Base and claim review plus discrepancy detection, sits on the custom plan, and the healthcare page does not say which plan carries the flag for inaccurate medical information. Independent discussion of AthenaHQ is thin; G2's 39 reviews average 4.9. ## 4. [Ahrefs Brand Radar](https://ahrefs.com/brand-radar): Both Engines From $50, Tagged by Service Line ![The Ahrefs Brand Radar home page](https://qvery.ai/blog/best-ai-visibility-tools-for-healthcare-brands/screenshot-ahrefs-brand-radar-homepage.webp) *Ahrefs Brand Radar's home page, captured October 18, 2026* - Custom prompts on Google AI Mode and ChatGPT among seven assistants. - Daily, weekly or monthly refresh, with one or more locations per question. > 💰 **Pricing** > - **Custom prompt packages:** $50 a month for 2,500 checks, $100 for 7,000, $250 for 25,000 > - **Brand Radar AI:** from $199 a month, with 2,500 checks > - **Included in paid Ahrefs plans:** 5 prompts on Lite ($129 a month), 10 on Standard ($249), 20 on Advanced ($449) Rating: 4.5 / 5 on G2 (723 reviews on G2, for the whole Ahrefs suite) **Pros** - Both engines on the smallest package - One check per question, engine and location, so the bill is predictable - Tags split questions by service line **Cons** - No documented check against your own facts - Checks multiply with every engine and location - The full record is easiest to work with through the API If your marketing team already works in Ahrefs, custom prompts are the cheapest way on this list to ask thirty questions on both engines daily. Ahrefs counts one check as one question on one assistant in one location, so thirty patient questions asked daily on two engines in one country come to 1,800 checks a month, inside the $50 package. Tags keep telehealth, therapy and pharmacy questions apart. The AI Responses API returns the question, the full response, the links it used, the country and the date it was last updated, and pulls of custom-prompt data cost no API units. Nothing in Brand Radar reads those answers against your payer list, so a person or a script does that part. ## 5. [Dageno AI](https://www.dageno.ai/): The Answer and Its URLs on a $49 Plan ![The homepage of Dageno AI](https://qvery.ai/blog/best-ai-visibility-tools-for-healthcare-brands/screenshot-dageno-homepage.webp) *Dageno AI's homepage, captured October 18, 2026* - Findings traced back to cited domains, URLs and the original answers. - The API and data exports from Scale. > 💰 **Pricing** > - **Starter:** $49 a month, 50 custom monitoring prompts, 1 project, a 7-day free trial > - **Growth:** $199 a month, 250 prompts, 2 projects > - **Scale:** $410 a month, 600 prompts, 5 projects, the API and exports > - **Custom plan:** quoted **Pros** - Both engines inside the $49 base price - Answers and their URLs on the entry plan - Every platform and region open on every plan **Cons** - One question on two engines uses two of 50 slots - Exports and the API start at $410 - No G2 reviews and little independent discussion Dageno's Starter plan lets you review the AI answers, citations and URLs on all nine platforms, both engines included, for $49 a month. Every model and region is open on every plan; the plans differ in how many questions, projects and competitors they hold. Its pricing FAQ states the arithmetic: the same prompt on different platforms and in different regions counts separately. Fifty slots therefore hold 25 patient questions on ChatGPT and Google AI Mode in one country, and thirty questions need Growth at $199. Independent discussion of Dageno is thin, and G2 lists no reviews. ## 6. [OtterlyAI](https://otterly.ai/): Responses and Citations a Click Apart, Google AI Mode Extra ![The homepage of OtterlyAI](https://qvery.ai/blog/best-ai-visibility-tools-for-healthcare-brands/screenshot-otterly-homepage.webp) *OtterlyAI's homepage, captured October 18, 2026* - ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity and Copilot as standard. - Unlimited countries and languages, and the API from Standard. > 💰 **Pricing** > - **Lite:** $29 a month, 15 prompts > - **Standard:** $189 a month, 100 prompts, API > - **Premium:** $489 a month, 400 prompts > - **Custom plan:** from 1,000 prompts > - **Google AI Mode add-on:** $9, $59 or $149 a month on Lite, Standard or Premium Rating: 4.7 / 5 on G2 (54 reviews on G2) **Pros** - Both engines from $38 a month - The answer and its cited URLs per run, dated - Every self-serve price on the page **Cons** - Google AI Mode costs extra on every plan - 15 questions on Lite - No documented check against your facts OtterlyAI splits each question into three tabs: an overview, the responses with their run dates, and the citations with the URLs used as sources. A reviewer can open a dated answer and the pages behind it without an export or an API. Lite plus the Google AI Mode add-on is **$38 a month**, the lowest entry price for both engines here, but its 15 questions cover three service lines at five questions each. Thirty questions take Standard plus its add-on, $248 a month. Independent discussion of OtterlyAI is thin; G2's 54 reviews average 4.7. ## 7. [Profound](https://www.tryprofound.com/): FactCheck Names the Page, After a Demo ![The homepage of Profound](https://qvery.ai/blog/best-ai-visibility-tools-for-healthcare-brands/screenshot-profound-homepage.webp) *Profound's homepage, captured October 18, 2026* - FactCheck on all plans, against a Knowledge Base you load. - Up to nine engines on the custom plan, Google AI Mode among them. - All-time history and CSV or JSON exports on the custom plan. > 💰 **Pricing** > - **Trial:** no charge, 50 prompts a day for 7 days on ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Overviews, a prompt set Profound recommends, one region, no history or exports > - **Custom plan:** tailored after a demo Rating: 4.5 / 5 on G2 (1,133 reviews on G2) **Pros** - Each wrong claim tied to the URLs behind it - Up to nine engines **Cons** - Google AI Mode only on the custom plan - The trial runs Profound's questions, not yours - No published price On paper, Profound's FactCheck comes closest to the whole job. It extracts the claims an answer makes about you, checks each one against a Knowledge Base you load, and for every inaccurate claim shows which citation URLs are tied to it. Its documentation puts the point in one line: "You know which page to update, not just that something is wrong." It sits seventh because of what you can buy without a sales call. Independent comment is thin and mixed. ## 8. [Scrunch](https://scrunch.com/): The Cited Pages on Core, the Full Record on Contract ![The homepage of Scrunch](https://qvery.ai/blog/best-ai-visibility-tools-for-healthcare-brands/screenshot-scrunch-homepage.webp) *Scrunch's homepage, captured October 18, 2026* - A 7-day free trial on Core. > 💰 **Pricing** > - **Core:** $250 a month, 125 prompts, 5,000 responses, 1 country, 1 language > - **Custom plan:** quoted, nine engines with Google AI Mode, API access Rating: 4.6 / 5 on G2 (74 reviews on G2) **Pros** - Cited URLs ranked across every tracked answer - A large response allowance on Core **Cons** - No Google AI Mode on Core - One country and one language on Core - The full-answer API needs a custom plan Scrunch's monitoring view reveals which domains and URLs are cited most across the answers you track, which points to the pages behind those answers. Its Responses API captures the full answers and citations for every run, and that API sits on the custom plan. Core asks ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Copilot in one country and one language, so a healthcare company that needs Google AI Mode is buying the custom plan. ## The Eight on the Payer-List Job **The eight tools on the payer-list owner's record** | Tool | Answer and cited page kept | Both engines from | Checks against your facts | Start with it if | |---|---|---|---|---| | GEO Agent by Qvery | Every answer and citation, daily | Not published | Your team or Qvery’s service | Nobody with the hours to read answers every week | | Peec AI | Every chat and URL cited | $95 a month | Facts you enter | Insured patients in many states | | AthenaHQ | Response analysis, CSV, sources | $295 a month | Custom plan | Several locations and service lines | | Ahrefs Brand Radar | API answers and links | $50 a month | Not documented | Your team already works in Ahrefs | | Dageno AI | Answers and URLs on Starter | $49 a month | Not documented | Mostly self-pay on a small budget | | OtterlyAI | Responses and Citations tabs | $38 a month | Not documented | Mostly self-pay on a small budget | | Profound | Exports and URLs per wrong claim | Custom plan | FactCheck, all plans | A compliance lead who wants a contract first | | Scrunch | API answers; top cited URLs | Custom plan | Not documented | Several engines, with budget for a contract | ## What Qvery Does Beside These Tools > At Qvery, we help clinic and telehealth groups spend less of their front-desk and credentialing time correcting what patients are told, with custom AI agents that read every answer naming you against your payer list and price sheet and hand the right person the page to fix. Qvery's agents read public answers and your list, keep patients' health records out, and change nothing until credentialing approves. We also set up the patient questions, read the answers with you, and work on the pages and listings those answers use. The GEO Agent keeps the daily answer record for that review. GEO Agent: https://qvery.ai/geo-agent/ ## Put Your Payer-List Review to Work Your team shows us how it reviews insurance answers today, and we agree what the agents may read and change. Two weeks after access is in place, the first agents are checking answers against your own payer list and price sheet. Have Qvery Build Your Clinic's Payer-List AI Agents: https://calendly.com/qvery-vlad/30min ## Frequently asked questions ### Does an AI visibility tool need a business associate agreement? HHS's guidance says a vendor becomes a business associate when its service involves the use or disclosure of patients' health records on behalf of a clinic, insurer or other covered entity. A business associate agreement is the contract a vendor signs to handle them. A tool that asks public questions and stores public answers handles none; keep intake messages and patient names out of the question list. ### How many Americans use AI for health information? In NORC's October 2025 survey, 27% of US adults had used AI at least once to get health information and another 24% said they might. About half said clear sourcing would raise their confidence in what AI tells them about their health. ### Can't we just ask ChatGPT ourselves? For a spot check, yes. OpenAI's help page says ChatGPT may use an approximate location from your IP address, so your office sees one local reading and a patient in the next state may see another. A tool asks the same questions on a schedule and keeps dated answers with the pages behind them. ### Why do ChatGPT and Google AI Mode say different things about us? They search differently. Google says AI Mode breaks a question into subtopics and runs many searches at once; OpenAI says ChatGPT rewrites a question into one or more targeted queries for its search partners. ### Can we correct what an assistant says about our insurance? Not by editing the answer, and OpenAI itself warns that search results and citations can be incomplete or incorrect. You change the pages the answers read: your own insurance and pricing pages first, the insurers' directories through each plan's update process, then the publishers' lists that name you. ### Which tool checks answers against our own facts? Peec AI checks each claim in a tracked answer against facts you enter, from its $95 Starter plan with both engines. Profound's FactCheck is on every plan, but Google AI Mode needs its custom plan, and AthenaHQ keeps claim review on its custom plan. The rest document no such check. ### What is the lowest listed price for tracking both engines? OtterlyAI's Lite plan with its Google AI Mode add-on is $38 a month for 15 questions, Dageno AI starts at $49 for 50 question slots, and Ahrefs' $50 package covers thirty daily questions on both engines in one country. All three prices are from the vendors' pages on October 18, 2026. ### How many patient questions do we need to track? Enough to cover the services, insurance questions and locations patients ask about. Thirty questions is the example setup priced here, not a target, and a plan's allowance is a ceiling rather than a quota to fill. ### What if two tools give us different results? Check that both asked the same question, on the same engine, from the same place and on the same date. For an insurance claim, the deciding reference is your current payer list, not whichever dashboard looks better. ### Is a free plan enough for ongoing tracking? Not for both engines. AthenaHQ's free Essential tier leaves out Google AI Mode, and Profound's trial is temporary and uses its own recommended questions, so neither keeps a record of your clinic's questions on ChatGPT and Google AI Mode. ### Do we need an API to use an AI visibility tool? No, not to read answers in a dashboard. An API matters only if another system has to pull the results; AthenaHQ's Starter exports CSV files and sells API access separately, so a file may be all you need. ### Do we have to delete old insurance facts? No. Peec lets you mark a fact inactive, so an old insurance statement stays on file without being used to judge today's answers. ### Can we choose by the highest review score? Not for this job. Ahrefs' G2 rating covers the whole suite, while the question here is how well Brand Radar keeps answers you can check against your payer list.